Show that
pg. 355-6
pg 359-61, some of #'s 1,2,3
pg 351
pg 342-4, some of #1-2, 7-9
some of #3-5
#6
If you aren't confident with the rules of sentential proof, you should work through some of the problems in Chapter 5.
For the simpler quantifier rules: any and all on pgs. 446, 447-8
any of pgs. 452, 456-7, 458-62
pgs. 478-484, 486-488
pgs. 491-2
Which pairs of symbols could you use to build a language equivalent to SL?
Is there any equivelent language with just one connective?
You can play around with possibilities, but here's a hint:
and & will work.
So will and v.
and
will not.
No one of the standard connectives will do alone, but try, for instance, the Sheffer Stroke:
A | B | A | B |
T | T | F |
T | F | T |
F | T | T |
F | F | T |
pgs. 53-4, #5
pgs. 83-4, #3
pgs. 257-9, all
pg. 288, #2
pg. 273-4, #1-2
pgs. 304-6, any of #1-4
pgs. 318-9 any of #1-3
You will have to symbolize some sentences on the exam by making your own key, so I recommend that you try a few of these problems without looking at the symbolization key in the book.
pgs. 329-31, #1 and #4